AISC 360-22: Specification for Structural Steel Buildings

AISC 360 is the governing specification for the design, fabrication, and erection of structural steel buildings in the United States. Published by the American Institute of Steel Construction, the current edition -- AISC 360-22 (16th Edition) -- took effect in 2022 and is referenced by the International Building Code (IBC) and ASCE/SEI 7-22. This page covers the specification's scope, chapter organization, resistance factors, key changes from the prior edition, and links to every calculator on this site that implements AISC 360 provisions.

Overview of AISC 360-22

AISC 360 provides requirements for the design of members, connections, and systems in structural steel buildings and other structures. The specification covers hot-rolled shapes, hollow structural sections (HSS), built-up members, plates, and connection elements.

Scope and applicability

The specification applies to structural steel buildings and non-building structures using steel members and connections. It does not cover cold-formed steel (governed by AISI S100), steel storage racks (RMI), steel joists (SJI), or transmission towers (ASCE 10). For composite construction with reinforced concrete, AISC 360 Chapter I works in conjunction with ACI 318.

LRFD vs ASD

AISC 360 provides two parallel design methods:

Both methods produce structures with equivalent reliability when loads are derived from the same load combinations. Our calculators implement LRFD only. Engineers using ASD should convert results or verify independently.

Referenced standards

AISC 360 is not standalone. A complete design typically requires:

Key Chapters

Chapter B: Design Requirements

Establishes the design basis including required strength, available strength, design for stability (Direct Analysis Method as the primary approach), member properties, and classification of sections as compact, noncompact, or slender. The Direct Analysis Method (B1 and Chapter C) replaced the older effective length method as the primary stability approach.

Chapter D: Design of Members for Tension

Covers tensile yielding of the gross section (phi = 0.90) and tensile rupture of the net section (phi = 0.75). The effective net area (A_e = U * A_n) uses shear lag factor U per Table D3.1, which depends on connection geometry. This chapter is straightforward but the shear lag factor is a frequent source of errors.

Chapter E: Design of Members for Compression

Governs column design. Section E3 addresses flexural buckling using the critical stress F_cr, which depends on the slenderness ratio KL/r relative to the limiting slenderness 4.71*sqrt(E/F_y). Section E4 covers torsional and flexural-torsional buckling for singly symmetric and unsymmetric sections. Section E7 addresses members with slender elements where local buckling reduces column capacity.

Chapter F: Design of Members for Flexure

Covers beams. The limit states include yielding (F2.1), lateral-torsional buckling (F2.2), flange local buckling (F3), and web local buckling. Lateral-torsional buckling depends on unbraced length L_b relative to L_p (plastic) and L_r (inelastic limit). Compact I-shapes use Section F2; noncompact and slender flanges use F3; channels, angles, tees, and HSS each have dedicated sections (F6-F11).

Chapter G: Design of Members for Shear

Section G2 covers I-shaped members. For most rolled W-shapes with h/t_w <= 2.24*sqrt(E/F_y), the web shear coefficient C_v1 = 1.0 and phi = 1.00 (LRFD) -- a simplification introduced in AISC 360-16. For all other cases, phi = 0.90 and C_v2 is computed based on web slenderness. Tension field action (G3) can increase shear capacity in stiffened web panels.

Chapter H: Combined Forces

Section H1 handles combined axial force and flexure using the interaction equations H1-1a (P_r/P_c >= 0.2) and H1-1b (P_r/P_c < 0.2). These bilinear interaction equations apply to doubly symmetric members and cover the majority of beam-column checks in practice.

Chapter I: Design of Composite Members

Covers composite columns (encased and filled), composite beams with steel headed stud anchors, and composite floor systems. Composite beam design requires determination of the degree of composite action and the shear stud demand per Table I3.2a.

Chapter J: Design of Connections

The most clause-dense chapter, governing bolts, welds, affected elements, and bearing. Key sections include:

Resistance Factors (Phi) -- LRFD

The following table summarizes the resistance factors used in AISC 360-22 LRFD design. These are the exact values implemented in our calculation engine.

Limit State Phi (LRFD) Omega (ASD) Clause
Tensile yielding (gross section) 0.90 1.67 D2(a)
Tensile rupture (net section) 0.75 2.00 D2(b)
Compression (flexural buckling) 0.90 1.67 E1
Flexure (yielding, LTB) 0.90 1.67 F1
Shear (most rolled W-shapes) 1.00 1.50 G1
Shear (other cases) 0.90 1.67 G1
Bolt shear 0.75 2.00 J3.6
Bolt bearing / tearout 0.75 2.00 J3.10
Slip-critical (serviceability) 1.00 1.50 J3.8
Slip-critical (strength-level) 0.85 1.76 J3.8
Block shear rupture 0.75 2.00 J4.3
Weld capacity (fillet, PJP, CJP) 0.75 2.00 J2.4
Concrete bearing 0.65 2.31 J8
Plate bending (base plates) 0.90 1.67 DG1
Anchor rod tension 0.75 2.00 ACI 318 17.5.1.2
Anchor rod shear 0.65 2.00 ACI 318 17.5.1.2

Note on phi = 1.00 for shear: AISC 360-16 introduced phi = 1.00 for shear in rolled I-shapes with h/t_w <= 2.24*sqrt(E/F_y), which covers essentially all standard W-shapes. This is retained in AISC 360-22.

Key Changes from AISC 360-16 to AISC 360-22

AISC 360-22 is an incremental update. The structural reliability framework and resistance factors are unchanged. Key modifications include:

Connection design (Chapter J)

Stability (Chapter C)

Member design

General

Cross-References to Other Standards

Engineers working across jurisdictions should note how AISC 360 maps to international equivalents:

AISC 360 Concept AS 4100 Equivalent EN 1993 Equivalent CSA S16 Equivalent
Phi factor (resistance) Phi (capacity factor) 1/gamma_M (partial factor) Phi (resistance factor)
LRFD load combos (ASCE 7) AS/NZS 1170 combos EN 1990 combos NBCC load combos
Chapter J (Connections) Section 9 (Connections) EN 1993-1-8 Clause 13 (Connections)
Chapter F (Flexure) Section 5 (Bending) EN 1993-1-1 Cl. 6.3.2 Clause 13.5-13.6
Chapter E (Compression) Section 6 (Compression) EN 1993-1-1 Cl. 6.3.1 Clause 13.3
Block shear (J4.3) Cl. 9.1.9 EN 1993-1-8 Cl. 3.10 Cl. 13.11

Available Calculators

Every calculator below implements AISC 360-22 LRFD provisions with full clause-by-clause derivation output. Select AISC 360 as the design code in the calculator interface.

Connection design

Member design

Utilities

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this site support ASD? No. All calculators implement LRFD only. For ASD equivalence, multiply the LRFD phi factor by the corresponding Omega to verify: phi * Omega is approximately 1.5 for most limit states.

Which edition does the calculator use? AISC 360-22 (16th Edition). The resistance factors and design equations are identical to 360-16 for connection and member checks. If you are working to 360-16, the calculator results are directly applicable.

How are bolt shear strengths determined? Nominal shear stress Fnv is taken from AISC Table J3.2 based on bolt grade and thread condition (threads included or excluded from the shear plane). The design shear strength is phi * Fnv * A_b * n_s, where phi = 0.75.

Can I use these results for seismic design? The calculators provide strength-level checks per AISC 360. For seismic applications, you must also satisfy AISC 341 requirements (expected yield stress R_y*F_y, overstrength factors, connection prequalification per AISC 358, and special detailing).

Related Pages

Copyright and Standards Notice

This page is a high-level educational guide to help engineers navigate AISC 360 provisions and use our calculators effectively. It does not reproduce copyrighted code text, proprietary tables, or design examples from the published specification. For authoritative requirements, purchase the official AISC 360-22 specification from aisc.org.

Disclaimer

This page is provided for general technical information and educational use only. It does not constitute professional engineering advice or a substitute for review by a qualified structural engineer. All structural design depends on project-specific loads, combinations, stability requirements, detailing, fabrication tolerances, and the governing code edition. You are responsible for verifying inputs, validating results independently, and obtaining professional sign-off. The site operator provides this content "as is" without warranties of any kind.