------------ | :-------: | :--------: | :--------: | | UC (h/b âÃÂä 1.2) | Major y-y | b | c | | UC (h/b âÃÂä 1.2) | Minor z-z | c | d | | UB (h/b > 1.2) | Major y-y | a | b | | UB (h/b > 1.2) | Minor z-z | b | c | | Hot-finished RHS | All | a | a0 |
The UK NA adopts different curve selections from the EN 1993-1-1 recommended values for certain cases, notably UC minor axis buckling which uses curve 'c' instead of 'b'.
Torsional and torsional-flexural buckling: For asymmetric or monosymmetric sections (channels, angles, tees), the UK NA requires checking the torsional buckling mode per Clause 6.3.1.4. The elastic critical load Ncr,T depends on the warping stiffness and St. Venant torsional rigidity. This is rarely critical for doubly-symmetric UC sections but can govern for UK channel sections used as columns.
Combined compression and bending — UK NA method: For UC sections subjected to NEd + My,Ed + Mz,Ed, the UK NA allows the simplified interaction check from Clause 6.3.3(4): NEd/(ÃÂÃÂy NRk/ÃÂóM1) + kyy ÃÂàMy,Ed/(ÃÂÃÂLT My,Rk/ÃÂóM1) + kyz ÃÂàMz,Ed/(Mz,Rk/ÃÂóM1) âÃÂä 1.0. The interaction factors kyy, kyz are per Annex B Tables B.1 and B.2.
UK Code Clause Reference — EN 1993-1-1 + UK NA
| Design Check | EN 1993-1-1 Clause | UK NA Modification |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-section resistance Nc,Rd | Clause 6.2.4 | ÃÂóM0 = 1.0 (adopted) |
| Flexural buckling Nb,Rd | Clause 6.3.1 | NA Table NA.3 — modified buckling curves |
| Non-dimensional slenderness ÃÂûÃÂà| Clause 6.3.1.3 | ÃÂû1 = 93.9ÃÂõ, ÃÂõ = âÃÂÃÂ(235/fy) |
| Imperfection factor ÃÂñ | Table 6.1 | UK NA curve selection per section type |
| Torsional buckling | Clause 6.3.1.4 | Required for asymmetric sections |
| Combined N + M | Clause 6.3.3 | Annex B method with UK NA factors |
| Partial factors | Clause 6.1 | ÃÂóM0 = ÃÂóM1 = 1.0 |
Related Resources
FAQ
What buckling curves does the UK NA specify? The UK National Annex specifies buckling curves based on section type and axis. For UC sections: curve 'b' for major axis, curve 'c' for minor axis (when tf âÃÂä 40 mm). For UB sections: curve 'a' for major axis, curve 'b' for minor axis.
How does the UK NA modify the slenderness calculation? The UK National Annex uses the same non-dimensional slenderness ÃÂûÃÂà= (Lcr/i)/(ÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂ(E/fy)) as the core Eurocode 3. The key difference is in the selection of the appropriate buckling curve from Table 6.2.
Does the calculator handle UK NA modified ÃÂóM factors? Yes. The UK National Annex specifies ÃÂóM0 = 1.0 and ÃÂóM1 = 1.0 (consistent with the recommended values in EN 1993-1-1).
Which axis governs column buckling for UC sections? The minor axis (z-z) almost always governs for UC sections because iz is significantly smaller than iy. For a typical 203ÃÂÃÂ203 UC 60, iy = 89.6 mm and iz = 51.8 mm — the minor axis slenderness is 73% higher. Unless lateral restraint is provided to the minor axis (e.g., cladding rails, shelf angles), use iz for buckling calculations.
What is the difference between S275 and S355 for column capacity? Moving from S275 to S355 increases cross-section resistance by 29% (355/275). However, the buckling reduction factor ÃÂàdecreases because higher-strength steel increases ÃÂûÃÂà(ÃÂõ = âÃÂÃÂ(235/fy) decreases). The net gain in Nb,Rd is typically 15-20% for columns in the practical slenderness range (0.5 < ÃÂûÃÂà< 1.5). For very slender columns (ÃÂûÃÂà> 2.0), the gain from higher-grade steel is negligible.
Can UC sections be used as beams? Yes. UC sections can be used as beams, especially where compression flange restraint is limited or where overall depth must be minimised. UC sections have wider flanges than UB sections, providing better lateral stability. However, UC sections are less efficient in bending than UB sections of equivalent weight due to their lower I/Wpl ratio.
How do I account for accidental eccentricity? Per EN 1993-1-1 Clause 5.3.2, columns in simple construction should be designed for a notional eccentricity of L/300 (but âÃÂÃÂ¥ 10 mm) from the geometric axis. This can be modelled as an equivalent horizontal force (0.5% of the vertical load) applied at each floor level per Clause 5.3.2(4).
Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only. Results must be verified by a licensed professional engineer. Steel Calculator provides preliminary design tools — NOT a substitute for professional engineering judgment.